The «Obvious» Nullity of the Marriage Resolved by the Judge in Family Procedural Law

  • Jorge Pariasca Martínez Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

Abstract

The autor invites us to reflect on an institution emerged in civil law and provided for in article 275 of the civil code, the «notorious» nullity of the marriage warned ex officio and resolved by the Judge in a process. In a didactic way, through a particular case, it introduces us to the judicial problem. There is no doubt that the topic is current, being useful for anyone who approaches family procedural law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República (2011). Casación 4664-2010-Puno. Lima: 18 de marzo de 2011.

——— (2016). Casación 4442-2015-Moquegua. Lima: 9 de agosto de 2016.

——— (2020). Casación 2343-2018-Huaura. Lima: 25 de marzo de 2020.

Ninamancco, F. (2018). Jurisprudencia civil vinculante de la Corte Suprema. Análisis de todos los plenos casatorios civiles. Gaceta Jurídica.

Peralta, J. (2002). Derecho de familia en el Código Civil (3.a ed.). Idemsa.

Plácido A. (2021). «Comentarios al artículo 274 del Código Civil». En: Muro M. y Torres M. (coordinadores).Código Civil comentado. Tomo II (5.a ed.). Gaceta Jurídica.

Varsi, E. (2020). Tratado de derecho de familia. Tomo II. Instituto Pacífico y Universidad de Lima.

Published
2021-12-20
How to Cite
Pariasca Martínez, J. (2021). The «Obvious» Nullity of the Marriage Resolved by the Judge in Family Procedural Law. Ius Et Tribunalis, 1(1). Retrieved from https://journals.continental.edu.pe/index.php/iusettribunalis/article/view/787
Issue
Año 7 - Número 7 (2021)
Section
Artículos

Copyright (c) 2023 Ius et Tribunalis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.